GSoC 2023: Week 1
Since I’m trying to write more and more, I decided to try and commit to keep you up-to-date with the progress of the project I’m working on for GSoC 2023.
This could be a nice opportunity for me to talk about the project, the tech stack that I’m using and issues I’m going to deal with during the entire journey. And also give you some little insights on the Tor Project, why not?
Let’s start off by saying that community members try to keep discussions about everything that concerns the project on publicly accessible channels: communication happens mostly on IRC, specifically on oftc.
There are three main channels:
#tor-projectis the main channel where community members talk about the project in general
#tor-devwhere people talk about dev related topics
#tor-meetingwhere each monday different teams at different time slots give updates on their progress on different projects
Each of those IRC channels is also mirrored on Matrix if you prefer that.
Week 1 is the so-called community bonding period, which is probably the best thing that you can get out of GSoC accoring to a lot of people that did it in the past (see here).
That’s what I did, I spent this week getting to know my mentors and the Tor Project itself, me and other GSoC mentees participated in a meeting where we explained what we are going to work on and why. I’ve coded very little during this period, it’s not what you should do at this very stage really so I don’t have a lot to share about that.
Before leaving, I would like to talk a bit more about the project for those of you who want a TLDR of the proposal that I linked last week in my article.
The issue that the Network Status team is facing is that the data retrivial process on the backend is very I/O bound since it works by creating files and aggregating data from them in responses. This of course uses a lot of resources and is slowing down the service. In order to solve this, a lot of the data in those files are now being moved to a big Postgres instance so that the service can scale accordingly to user demand. Not only that, but data is also going to be pushed in a VictoriaMetrics timeseries database so that we can provide historical data about relays and bridges.
The project I’m working on does exactly that: exposes APIs that will return data
queried from those two instances, hopefully making onionoo obsolete. We decided
to go for Rust and
actix_web for the service framework because it’s
one of the the fastes
and reliable out there, both crucial factors in this case. I’ve used
a couple of times for simpler personal services before so I’m in no way an
expert of the framework but that’s the very reason why I applied for this exact
project: learn more about
actix_web and work with Rust, all of this
contributing to the FOSS community.
I’ll see you next week with more updates.